Abstract and keywords
Abstract:
Concepts and terms related to sustainable development frequently overlap in contemporary foreign literature. The current system of concepts is redundant, lacks a unified approach, and needs a clearer theoretical and terminological structure. This article introduces a new classification of sustainable development definitions to more precisely characterize their scope goals, roles, conditions, nature, levels, and effectiveness. This classification system relies on a set of criteria reflecting the essence, nature, features, and specificity of concepts, such as sustainable development, corporate sustainability, and corporate social responsibility. The author identifies criteria characterizing the essence, conceptual foundations, conditions, and implementation mechanisms of sustainable development at the micro and macro levels. The synthesis of these categories and criteria resulted in a structured classification system. The defined terms reflect: 1) the fundamental approach; 2) initiation; 3) the implementation level; 4) the implementation mechanism; 5) prioritization within the triple bottom line approach; 6) activity type.

Keywords:
sustainable development, sustainable development of a company, corporate sustainability, corporate social responsibility, circular economy, multi-criteria approach
Text
Text (RU) (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Andrianov V. Conceptual approach to worked out strategy of sustainable development of Russian Federation till 2030. Society and Economy, 2016, (7): 5–35. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/whkhsf

2. Kovalev Yu. Yu. Sustainable development and the EU’s policies for its implementation. Izvestiya Uralskogo Federalnogo universiteta. Seriya 3. Obshchestvennye nauki, 2014, (4): 54–65. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/teucoz

3. Pearce D. Green economics. Environmental Values, 1992, 1(1): 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327192776680179

4. Clark W. C., Dickson N. M. Sustainability science: The emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2003, 100(14): 8059–8061. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231333100

5. Malthus T. R. An essay on the principle of population. St. Petersburg, 1868, 944. (In Russ.)

6. Pigou A. S. The economics of welfare. Moscow: Progress, 1985, vol. 2, 454. (In Russ.)

7. Coase R. The firm, the market, and the law. Moscow: Delo LTD, 1993, 192. (In Russ.)

8. Vernadsky V. I. Biosphere: Selected works on biogeochemistry. Moscow: Mysl, 1967, 376. (In Russ.)

9. Vernadsky V. I. Biosphere and noosphere. Moscow: Nauka, 1989, 261. (In Russ.)

10. Kondratev N. D. Large cycles of conjuncture and the theory of foresight. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2002, 765. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qtgoaj

11. Solow R. M. Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1957, 39(3): 312–320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047

12. Solow R. M. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956, 70(1): 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513

13. Solow R. M. Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. The Review of Economic Studies, 1974, 41(5): 29–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296370

14. Solow R. M. On the intergenerational allocation of natural resources. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1986, 88(1): 141–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/3440280

15. Meadows D. H., Meadows D. L., Randers J., Behrens III W. The limits to growth. Moscow: MSU, 1991, 208. (In Russ.)

16. Mesarovic M. D., Pestel E. C. Mankind at the turning point: The second report to the Club of Rome. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., 1974, 210.

17. Commoner B. The closing circle. Moscow: Gidrometeoizdat, 1974, 280. (In Russ.)

18. Commoner B. Technology of profit. Moscow: Mysl, 1976, 112. (In Russ.)

19. Goals for mankind: A report to the Club of Rome, ed. Laszlo E. New York: Dutton, 1977, 434.

20. Huber J. Die verlorene Unschuld der Ökologie, Neue Technologien und susperindustrielle Entwicklung. Frankfurt am Main: Fisher Verlag, 1982, 256.

21. Jänicke M. Preventive environmental policy as ecological modernization and structural policy. Berlin: IIUG, 1985, 36.

22. Spaargaren G., Mol A. P. J. Sociology, environment, and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society & Natural Resources, 1992, 5(4): 323–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941929209380797

23. Oldak P. G. Equilibrium nature management. An economist's view. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1983, 128. (In Russ.)

24. Gorshkov V. G. Limits of stability of the biosphere and the environment. Leningrad: LINP, 1987, 62. (In Russ.)

25. Barbier E. B. The concept of sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation, 1987, 14(2): 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900011449

26. Pearce D., Markandya A., Barbier E. B. Blueprint for a green economy. London: Earthscan, 1989, 192.

27. Ursul A. D., Ursul T. A. Global research and the formation of the noosphere through sustainable development. Politics and Society, 2012, (4): 114–125. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qacjod

28. Grossman G. M., Krueger A. B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Papers Series, 1991, (3914). https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914

29. Selden T. M., Song D. Environmental quality and development: Is there Kuznets curve for air pollution emission? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1994, 27(2): 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1031

30. Winslow M. The environmental Kuznets curve revisited once again. Forum for Social Economics, 2005, 35(1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02746011

31. Bobylev S. Sustainable development: Paradigm for the future. World Economy and International Relations, 2017, 61(3): 107–113. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-3-107-113

32. Green economy and sustainable development goals for Russia, eds. Bobylev S. N. , Kiryushin P. A. , Kudryavtseva O. V. . Moscow: MSU, 2019, 284. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ujdztg

33. Daly H. E. Steady-state economics: Second edition with new essays. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1991, 302.

34. Costanza R., Daly H. E. Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 1992, 6(1): 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x

35. Costanza R., d’Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R. V., Paruelo J., Raskin R. G., Sutton P., Van den Belt M. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997, 387: 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

36. Strategy and problems of sustainable development of Russia in the 21st century, eds. Granberg A. G., Danilov-Danilyan V. I., Tsikanov M. M., Shopkhoev E. S. Moscow: Ekonomika, 2002, 414. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/agvlyb

37. Gorshkov V. G., Kondratev K. Ya., Danilov-Danilyan V. I., Losev K. S. Environment: From new technologies to new mind. Moscow: VINITI RAS, 1994, 27. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ocgrcg

38. Losev K. S. Ecological issues and sustainable development perspectives of Russia at the XXI century. Moscow: Kosmosinform, 2001, 399. (In Russ.)

39. Sustainable development: New challenges, eds. Danilov-Danilyan V. I., Piskulova N. A. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 2015, 336. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zbgoyx

40. Moiseev N. N. Ecology and education. Moscow: Yunisam, 1996, 192. (In Russ.)

41. Moiseev N. N. Strategy for a transition period. Words of the scientist: Sustainable development means implementation of a human strategy. Ekologiya i zhizn, 2007, (2): 5–8. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/mqqkhx

42. Nazaretyan A. P. Nonlinear future: Megahistory, synergetics, cultural anthropology, and psychology in global forecasting. 4th ed. Moscow: Argamak-Media, 2017, 508. (In Russ.)

43. Rosenberg G. S., Krasnoshchekov G. P., Krylov Yu. M., Pavlonsky V. A., Pisarev A. S., Chernikova S. A. Sustainable development: Myths and reality. Tolyatti: IEVB RAS, 1998, 191. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/zvywcz

44. Brown L. R. Eco-economy: Building an economy for the Earth. Moscow: Ves Mir, 2003, 392. (In Russ.)

45. Stiglitz J., Sen A., Fitoussi J.-P. Mis-measuring our lives: Why GDP doesn't add up? The report of the Commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress. Moscow: Gaidar Institute, 2015, 216. (In Russ.)

46. Starikova E. A. The contemporary approaches to interpretation of the sustainable development concept. RUDN Journal of Economics, 2017, 25(1): 7–17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2329-2017-25-1-7-17

47. Biely K., Maes D., Van Passel S. The idea of weak sustainability is illegitimate. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2018, 20: 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9878-4

48. Alcott B. The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact? Ecological Economics, 2008, 64(4): 770–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.015

49. Porfiriev B. N. "Green" factor in innovative modernization of the economy: A challenge for Russia. Moscow University Economics Bulletin, 2016, (3): 3–14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.38050/01300105201631

50. Ponomarenko T., Nevskaya M., Marinina O. An assessment of the applicability of sustainability measurement tools to resource-based economies of the commonwealth of independent states. Sustainability, 2020, 12(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145582

51. Betilgiriev M. A., Datsayeva R. S. Conceptual approaches of provision of a sustainable development of the enterprise as managing subject of economy of region. Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami, 2012, (1). (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wdftni

52. Nikolaev V. E., Kuzmina E. I., Nikolaev V. V. Certification of sustainable development management systems. Vestnik kachestva, 2010, (1): 20–27. (In Russ.)

53. Salimova T. A., Gudkova D. D. Assessment tools for sustainable development of the organization. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Economics, 2017, 10(5): 151–160. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/ztszbl

54. Modeling of sustainable development as a condition for increasing the economic security of the territory, ed. Gizatullin Kh. N. Ekaterinburg: Ural University, 1999, 277. (In Russ.)

55. Bogdanov V. D., Ilysheva N. N., Baldesku E. V., Zakirov U. Sh. The development of correlation model between economic development and environmental performance on the basis of non-financial reporting. Economy of Region, 2016, 12(1): 93–104. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vqgxrv

56. Efimova O. V. Forming reports on sustainable development: Stages and procedures. Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, 2018, 5(3): 40–53. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xtfydr

57. Volkov M. A. Analysis of sustainable development factors impact on business value. Bulletin of Science and Education, 2018, 1(4): 57–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20861/2312-8089-2018-40-011

58. Mnatsakanyan A. G., Kharin A. G. The principles of sustainable development in company management. Social economic phenomena and processes, 2016, 11(10): 41–50. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xafwxl

59. Ponomarenko T. V., Sergeev I. B. Modelling of resource value of the integrated mining companies taking into account corporate programs of development. Journal of Mining Institute, 2014, 208: 164–171. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sjuczf

60. Pikalova T. A. The corporate social responsibility of system forming mining and metallurgical companies of Russia. Journal of Mining Institute, 2013, 206: 193–198. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sdbppr

61. Nedosekin A. O., Rejshahrit E. I., Kozlovskiy A. N. Strategic approach to assessing economic sustainability objects of mineral resources sector of Russia. Journal of Mining Institute, 2019, 237: 354–360. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2019.3.354

62. Yurak V. V., Dushin A. V., Mochalova L. A. Vs sustainable development: Scenarios for the future. Journal of Mining Institute, 2020, 242: 242–247. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31897/PMI.2020.2.242

63. Dushin A. V., Ignatieva M. N. Impact of mineral resources on economic growth. News of the Ural State Mining University, 2013, (3): 52–56. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/rjvcnh

64. Kaplan A. V., Baev I. A., Tereshina M. A. Management of social and economic development of a mining enterprise in the context of systemic unity. Chelyabinsk: SUSU, 2021, 206. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/erbgtq

65. Kaplan A. V. Management of socio-economic development of a mining enterprise: Theory and methodology. Dr. Econ. Sci. Diss. Chelyabinsk, 2015, 327. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/yzxlnz

66. Cleary S., Malre T. Global risk: Business success in turbulent times. Moscow: Voprosy ekonomiki, 2011, 224. (In Russ.)

67. Yakimchuk S. V., Saprykina I. A. Factors of stability of functioning of industrial enterprises. Relevant issues of economy in the context of reforming modern society: Proc. IV Intern. Sci.-Prac. Conf., Belgorod, 25 Nov 2015. Belgorod: Epitsentr, 2016, 264–266. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vpctkh

68. Khudyakova T. A. Analysis of modern scientific approaches to the construction of integral indicators of enterprises' sustainability. Bulletin NGIEI, 2016, (12): 122–130. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/xicnqr

69. Poltarykhin A. L., Mikhaylushkin P. V. "Green" economy as priority sustainable development. Academy Bulletin, 2016, (1): 17–21. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/wawfov

70. Elkington J. Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 1994, 36(2): 90–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746

71. Elkington J. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Gabriola Island-Stony Creek: New Society Publishers, 1998, 407.

72. Starikova E. A. Importance of the concept of sustainable development in the activities of transnational corporations. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law, 2017, 7(2): 125–136. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.7.2.38043

73. Blagov Yu. E. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of the concept. St. Petersburg: Vysshaya shkola menedzhmenta, 2010, 272. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/llqaoc

74. Dyllick T., Hockerts K. Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2002, 11(2): 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323

75. Van Marrewijk M., Werre M. Multiple levels of corporate sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 2003, 44: 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023383229086

76. Ivashkovskaya I. V. Modeling the value of the company. Strategic responsibility of the boards of directors. Moscow: Infra-M, 2009, 430. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/qimjrj

77. Steurer R., Langer M. E., Konrad A., Martinuzzi A. Corporations, stakeholders and sustainable development I: A theoretical exploration of business – society relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 2005, 61(3): 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7054-0

78. Wheeler D., Colbert B., Freeman R. E. Focusing on value: Reconciling corporate social responsibility, sustainability and a stakeholder approach in a network world. Journal of General Management, 2003, 28(3). https://elibrary.ru/dvrnlh

79. Bergman M. M., Bergman Z., Berger L. An empirical exploration, typology, and definition of corporate sustainability. Sustainability, 2017, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050753

80. Epstein M. J., Roy M.-J. Making the business case for sustainability. Linking social and environmental actions to financial performance. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2003, (9): 79–96.

81. Montiel I., Delgado-Ceballos J. Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet? Organization & Environment, 2014, 27(2): 113–139.

82. Antolín-López R., Delgado-Ceballos J., Montiel I. Deconstructing corporate sustainability: A comparison of different stakeholder metrics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, vol. 136, pt. A: 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.111

83. Schaltegger S., Burritt R. Chapter 5: Corporate sustainability. The international yearbook of environmental and resource economics 2005/2006: A survey of current issues. New horizons in environmental economics, eds. Folmer H., Tietenberg T. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2005, 185–222. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845425593.00012

84. Blinova E., Ponomarenko T., Knysh V. Analyzing the concept of corporate sustainability in the context of sustainable business development in the mining sector with elements of circular economy. Sustainability, 2022, 14(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14138163

85. Blinova E., Ponomarenko T., Tesovskaya S. Key corporate sustainability assessment methods for coal companies. Sustainability, 2023, 15(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075763

86. Elkington J. Enter the triple bottom line. The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? Assessing the sustainability of business and CSR, eds. Henriques A., Richardson J. London: Earths can Publications Ltd., 2004, chapt. 1. URL: https://www.johnelkington.com/archive/TBL-elkington-chapter.pdf (accessed 10 Oct 2025).

87. Efimova O. V. Sustainability report as a new form of corporate reporting. Auditorskie vedomosti, 2014, (8): 36–47. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/sjvrtf

88. Jones T. M., Wicks A. C. Convergent stakeholder theory. The Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(2): 206–221. https://doi.org/10.2307/259075

89. Ponomarenko T. V., Volnik R., Marinina O. A. Corporate social responsibility in coal industry (practices of Russian and European companies). Journal of Mining Institute, 2016, 222: 882–891. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18454/PMI.2016.6.882

90. Blagov Yu. E. Genesis of the concept of corporate social responsibility. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management, 2006, (2): 3–24. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/hucihp

91. Kostin A. E. Corporate responsibility and sustainable development. Moscow: Institute for Sustainable Development of the Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation; Center for Russian Environmental Policy, 2013, 80. (In Russ.)

92. Okorochkova A. A. Measurable macroeconomics: New indexes of sustainable development and corporate social responsibility. Public Administration. E-journal, 2015, (53): 59–89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2070-1381-2015-00073

93. Meseguer-Sánchez V., Gálvez-Sánchez F. J., López-Martínez G., Molina-Moreno V. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability. A bibliometric analysis of their interrelations. Sustainability, 2021, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041636

94. Bansal T., DesJardine M. Don't confuse sustainability with corporate social responsibility. Huffpost, 2015. URL: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/ivey-business-school/sustainable-business_b_5678831.html (accessed 10 Oct 2025).

95. Montiel I. Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization & Environment, 2008, 21(3): 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026608321329

96. Sheehy B., Farneti F. Corporate social responsibility, sustainability, sustainable development and corporate sustainability: What is the difference, and does it matter? Sustainability, 2021, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115965

97. Rasche A., Waddock S. Global sustainability governance and the UN global compact: A rejoinder to critics. Journal of Business Ethics, 2014, 122(2): 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2216-6

98. Voegtlin C., Pless N. M. Global governance: CSR and the role of the UN global compact. Journal of Business Ethics, 2014, 122(2): 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2214-8

99. Sheehy B. Conceptual and institutional interfaces between CSR, corporate law and the problem of social costs. Virginia Law & Business Review, 2017, 12(1): 93–147.

100. Pertseva E. Yu., Anshin V. M., Glazovskaya E. S. Project management approach to implementation of companies' sustainable development concept. Moscow: Infra-M, 2015, 180. (In Russ.) https://elibrary.ru/vzmlqj

101. Bansal P., Song H.-C. Similar but not the same: Differentiating corporate sustainability from corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Annals, 2017, 11(1): 105–149. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0095

102. Aguilera R. V., Rupp D. E., Williams C. A., Ganapathi J. Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(3): 836–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678

103. Lozano R. Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, 16(17): 1838–1846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.02.008

104. Kuhlman T., Farrington J. What is sustainability? Sustainability, 2010, 2(11): 3436–3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436


Login or Create
* Forgot password?