Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
Journals KemSU
Scientific journal "Bulletin of KemSU. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences Scientific journal "Bulletin of KemSU. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences Scientific journal "Bulletin of KemSU. Series: Biological, Engineering and Earth Sciences SibScript (until February 17, 2023 – Bulletin of KemSU Strategizing: Theory and Practice Foods and Raw Materials Virtual Communication and Social Networks Food Processing: Techniques and Technology Dairy industry Cheese- and buttermaking Science Evolution
Author Guidelines Editorial board
Submit manuscript
Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences
VAK Russia 12.00.15

MEDIATION INNOVATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE JUDICIAL POLICY OF MODERN RUSSIA Mediation Innovations in the Context of the Judicial Policy of Modern Russia

Published in Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences · Volume 4, Issue 1 · Pages 88–94 · Rubric: JURISPRUDENCE
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2020-4-1-88-94
Received: 08.05.2020 Accepted: 27.11.2025
Authors
EG Egor Trezubov
Egor Trezubov
ORCID ResearcherID SPIN
EK
Ekaterina Isakova
ABSTRACT
The article deals with mediation, or reconciliation of the parties, as a new procedure in the Russian civil judicial practice. The main advantage of judicial reconciliation is in the status of a mediator. As a rule, the mediator is a retired experienced judge who explains the law and the relevant judicial practice to the participants. However, mediation does not reduce the judicial load; it neither curtails the time of the trial nor saves the budget costs. Mediation, as well as other alternative methods of dispute settlement, can be actively applied only in a legally and economically developed society. Therefore, Russian judicial reconciliation has a long way to go. At the moment, the lack of real financial support from the government is an insurmountable obstacle for mediation. Moreover, the number of mediators differs from region to region. Therefore, the new practice needs combined efforts of the entire judicial system, from local courts to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Mediation is effective only if it means persuasion of the parties to reconciliation and proper governmental financing.
KEYWORDS
udicial reconciliation, conciliation procedures, state judicial policy, mediation, judicial conciliators
Text References
Text
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Zagaynova S. K. Improvement of the institute of conciliation in the civil procedure. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess, 2019, (7): 24-28. (In Russ.)

2. Kolokolov N. A. In search of a mediation regulation. Mirovoy sud'ya, 2020, (1): 9-15. (In Russ.)

3. Zaychenko E. V. On the role of a judicial representative in the conciliation of the parties. Rossiiskii sudia, 2019, (9): 31-38. (In Russ.)

4. Borisova E. A. Judicial conciliation: who is guilty and what to do? Rossiiskii sudia, 2019, (9): 20-23. (In Russ.)

5. Nosyreva E. I., Filchenko D. G. Main provisions of the concept on the institution of a reconciliation of the parties in civil proceedings (second part). The herald of civil process, 2015, (2): 140-155. (In Russ.)

6. Abolonin V. O. Forensic mediation: theory, practice, and prospects. Moscow: Infotropic Media, 2014, book 6, 408. (In Russ.)

7. Lazarev S. V. Basics of judicial reconciliation. Moscow: Infotropic Media, 2011, 256. (In Russ.)

8. Lisitsyn V. V. Mediation a vector for improving the arbitration procedure legislation. Rossiiskii sudia, 2012, (5): 27-33. (In Russ.)

9. Lisitsyn V. V. Revisiting judicial reconciliation. Administrator suda, 2015, (4): 26-29. (In Russ.)

10. Abolonin V. O. Commercial mediation in Russia: a special vector of development. Zakon, 2012, (3): 57-67. (In Russ.)

11. Voronov A. F. On the improvement of mediation procedures. Pravo v Vooruzhennykh silakh, 2019, (10): 47-55. (In Russ.)

12. Zhuykov V. M. The role of a court in the conciliation of parties to civil cases. Rossiiskii sudia, 2019, (9): 24-30. (In Russ.)

13. Gavrilov S. O., Gavrilova A. V., Kazmin V. N., Kazmina M. V., Volkov N. A., Balayan E. Yu., Leonova T. Yu., Popova T. Yu., Isakova E. G., Ivlev S. V., Trezubov E. S., Komissarova E. L., Kozlova N. V., Bogolyubov E. A., Nevzorova M. T., Luchenok E. V., Arefieva T. S. The history and modern trends in the development of the civil society and the state (the human rights aspect). Moscow: Prospekt, 2019, 432. (In Russ.)

This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
PDF JATS XML
The contact persons
Irina Morozova
Chief editor
Irina Morozova
ishmorozova@yandex.ru
Egor Trezubov
Deputy Editor-in-Chief
Egor Trezubov
egortrezubov@mail.ru
10011
downloads
RINC RINC Science Index Socionet Crossref Cyberleninka Dimensions ERIH PLUS VAK The Lens Directory of Open Access Journals
CC
This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Creative Commons
© КемГУ, 1997–2025
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Powered by Editorum, 2026
Login or Create
* Forgot your password?