ОРГАНОЛЕПТИЧЕСКАЯ ОЦЕНКА ТРАДИЦИОННЫХ ИНДИЙСКИХ ДЕСЕРТОВ С ДОБАВЛЕНИЕМ СИРОПА АГАВЫ
Аннотация и ключевые слова
Аннотация (русский):
Сахар является вредным для человеческого организма продуктом, за что его часто называют «сладкий яд». Поиск замены сахара - актуальная область научных исследований в пищевой промышленности. Альтернативным натуральным подсластителем может служить сироп агавы. Цель исследования заключалась в проведении органолептической оценки традиционных индийских десертов «кхир севьян» (пудинг с вермишелью) и «рава шира» (пудинг из манки), в которых сахар заменяли сиропом агавы. Органолептическую оценку проводили группой кулинарных экспертов и полуэкспертов по девятибалльный гедонистической шкале и методом парной пробы, т. е. сравнительного анализа контрольного образца с экспериментальным. Потребительские качества проверяли путем расчета значимых различий между экспериментальными десертами, приготовленными по стандартизированным рецептурам, и контрольными образцами. Десерт «кхир севьян», приготовленный с сиропом агавы вместо сахара, получил более высокую органолептическую оценку в обеих группах (p > 0,05): как эксперты, так и полуэксперты предпочли десерты с сиропом агавы контрольным образцам, приготовленным с использованием сахара. Результаты получили высокую степень надежности (альфа Кронбаха = 0,925). Тест на потребительские качества не выявил существенных различий между контрольными и экспериментальными образцами. При этом образцы десерта «рава шира» с сиропом агавы получили более низкую органолептическую оценку. В целом сироп агавы был расценен как перспективная замена сахара в традиционных индийских десертах. Данное исследование помогло выявить предпочтения клиентов в отношении натуральных подсластителей и продемонстрировало важность органолептической оценки в определении потребительских качеств инновационных продуктов питания. Описанная методика может быть использована в качестве образца для будущих исследований полезных заменителей традиционных пищевых компонентов. Перспективы введения сиропа агавы в массовое производство в составе данных блюд традиционной индийской кухни требуют дальнейшего изучения. Питательные свойства сиропа агавы могут быть исследованы на материале более широкого спектра традиционных индийских десертов с различными комбинациями ингредиентов.

Ключевые слова:
Сироп агавы, индийские традиционные десерты, органолептическая оценка, анализ питательных свойств, разработка продуктов питания
Список литературы

1. Throsby K. Pure, white and deadly: sugar addiction and the cultivation of urgency. Food, Culture and Society. 2020; 23(1):11–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2019.1679547

2. Freeman CR, Zehra A, Ramirez V, Wiers CE, Volkow ND, Wang G-J. Impact of sugar on the body brain and behavior. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark. 2018;23(12):2255–2266. https://doi.org/10.2741/4704

3. Yosry A, Elarieby M, Elsharif A. Sweet poison (sugar) [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 26]. Available from: http:// repository.limu.edu.ly/handle/123456789/1335

4. Gaur MP. Sucrose - sweet poison for masses. International Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2020;14(1):156–160. https://ijeponline.org/index.php/journal/article/view/162

5. Sweet poison: How excess sugar is bad for you [Internet]. [cited 2023 Nov 26]. Available from: https://starmed. care/sweet-poison-how-excess-sugar-is-bad-for-you/

6. Studdert DM, Flanders J, Mello MM. Searching for public health law’s sweet spot: The regulation of sugar-sweetened beverages. PLoS Medicine. 2015;12(7):e1001848. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001848

7. Epstein LH, Gordy CC, Raynor HA, Beddome M, Kilanowski CK, Paluch R. Increasing fruit and vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. Obesity Research. 2001;9(3):171–178. https:// doi.org/10.1038/oby.2001.18

8. Modan M, Halkin H, Almog S, Lusky A, Eshkol A, Shefi M, et al. Hyperinsulinemia. A link between hypertension obesity and glucose intolerance. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 1985;75(3):809–817. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci111776

9. Witek K, Wydra K, Filip M. A high-sugar diet consumption, metabolism and health impacts with a focus on the development of substance use disorder: A narrative review. Nutrients. 2022;14(14):2940. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14142940

10. Hill JO, Prentice AM. Sugar and body weight regulation. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1995;62(1): 264S–274S. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/62.1.264s

11. Temple NJ. Fat, sugar, whole grains and heart disease: 50 years of confusion. Nutrients. 2018;10(1):39. https:// doi.org/10.3390/nu10010039

12. The sweet danger of sugar [Internet]. Harvard Health. 2022 [cited 2023 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www. health.harvard.edu/heart-health/the-sweet-danger-of-sugar

13. Eating too much added sugar increases the risk of dying with heart disease [Internet]. Harvard Health. 2014 [cited 2023 Nov 26]. Available from: https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/eating-too-much-added-sugar-increases-the-risk-of-dying- with-heart-disease-201402067021

14. Lean MEJ, Te Morenga L. Sugar and type 2 diabetes. British Medical Bulletin. 2016;120(1):43–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldw037

15. Miller AW, Orr T, Dearing D, Monga M. Loss of function dysbiosis associated with antibiotics and high fat, high sugar diet. The ISME Journal. 2019;13(6):1379–1390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-019-0357-4

16. Andreas E, Reid M, Zhang W, Moley KH. The effect of maternal high-fat/high-sugar diet on offspring oocytes and early embryo development. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2019;25(11):717–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaz049

17. Heinonline. [Internet]. org. [cited 2023 Nov 26]. Available from: https://heinonline.org/hol-cgibin/get_pdf.cgi?handle= hein.journals/injlolw11§ion=681

18. Xu Y, Wu Y, Liu Y, Li J, Du G, Chen J, et al. Sustainable bioproduction of natural sugar substitutes: Strategies and challenges. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2022;129:512–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2022.11.008

19. Saraiva A, Carrascosa C, Ramos F, Raheem D, Raposo A. Agave syrup: chemical analysis and nutritional profile, applications in the food industry and health impacts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(12):7022. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127022

20. Álvarez-Chávez J, Villamiel M, Santos-Zea L, Ramírez-Jiménez AK. Agave by-products: An overview of their nutraceutical value, current applications, and processing methods. Polysaccharides. 22021;2(3):720–743. https://doi.org/10.3390/ polysaccharides2030044

21. Espinosa-Andrews H, Urías-Silvas JE, Morales-Hernández N. The role of agave fructans in health and food applications: A review. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2021;114:585–598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.06.022

22. Yargatti R, Muley A. Agave syrup as a replacement for sucrose: An exploratory review. Functional Foods in Health and Disease. 2022;12(10):590–600. https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v12i10.1003

23. Ozuna C, Franco-Robles E. Agave syrup: An alternative to conventional sweeteners? A review of its current technological applications and health effects. LWT. 2022;162:113434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113434

24. Rodríguez-Rodríguez R, Barajas-Álvarez P, Morales-Hernández N, Camacho-Ruíz RM, Espinosa-Andrews H. Physical properties and prebiotic activities (Lactobacillus spp.) of gelatine-based gels formulated with agave fructans and agave syrups as sucrose and glucose substitutes. Molecules. 2022;27(15):4902. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27154902

25. Cardona-Herrera R, Franco-Robles E, Quiñones-Muñoz TA, Ozuna C. The hydrolysis degree of agave syrup modulates its functional properties: Impact on metabolic responses and oxidative stress in C57BL/6 mice. Food Bioscience. 2023;53: 102775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2023.102775

26. Brown R. Sugar free and reduced sugar chocolate and methods of manufacture. US Patent 20080248183A1. October 2008.

27. Strode I, Galoburda R. Rheological Properties of Chocolate Depending on the Added Sweetener. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific Conference “Student on Their Way to Science” Collection of Abstracts. Jelgava, Latvia; 2016. p. 54.

28. Dhillon-Gill RK. Nutritional supplement. US Patent 20100029581A1. February 2010.

29. Ozuna C, Trueba-Vázquez E, Moraga G, Llorca E, Hernando I. Agave Syrup as an Alternative to Sucrose in Muffins: Impacts on Rheological, Microstructural, Physical, and Sensorial Properties. Foods. 2020;9(7):895. https://doi.org/10.3390/ foods9070895

30. Santiago-García PA, Mellado-Mojica E, León-Martínez FM, Dzul-Cauich JG, López MG, García-Vieyra MI. Fruc- tans (agavins) from Agave angustifolia and Agave potatorum as fat replacement in yogurt: Effects on physicochemical, rheological, and sensory properties. LWT. 2021;140:110846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110846

31. Zamora-Gasga VM, Bello-Pérez LA, Ortíz-Basurto RI, Tovar J, Sáyago-Ayerdi SG. Granola bars prepared with Agave tequilana ingredients: Chemical composition and in vitro starch hydrolysis. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2014; 56(2):309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.12.016

32. Saveski A, Stamatovska V, Pavlova V, Kalevska T, Spirovska Vaskoska R. Sensory analysis of raspberry jam with different sweeteners. Food Science, Engineering and Technologies. 2015;294–297. https://eprints.uklo.edu.mk/id/eprint/1687/

33. Song CR, Kim ES, Kim HA, Kim YS, Choi SK. Quality Characteristics of Teriyaki sauce Added with Different Sweeteners. Culinary Science and Hospitality Research. 2012;18(2):197–205. https://koreascience.kr/article/JAKO201218553923376.pdf

34. Jardines AP, Arjona-Román JL, Severiano-Pérez P, Totosaus-Sánchez A, Fiszman S, Escalona-Buendía HB. Agave fructans as fat and sugar replacers in ice cream: Sensory, thermal and texture properties. Food Hydrocolloids. 2020;108:106032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.106032

35. Jimenez-Sánchez DE, Calderón-Santoyo M, Ortiz-Basurto RI, Bautista-Rosales PU, Ragazzo-Sánchez JA. Effect of maltodextrin reduction and native agave fructans addition on the physicochemical properties of spray-dried mango and pineapple juices. Food Science and Technology International. 2018;24(6):519–532. https://doi.org/10.1177/1082013218769168

36. Mayer M. US Patent 12/651,939. 2010.

37. Sobaszek P, Różyło R, Dziki L, Gawlik-Dziki U, Biernacka B, Panasiewicz M. Evaluation of Color, Texture, Sensory and Antioxidant Properties of Gels Composed of Freeze-Dried Maqui Berries and Agave Sugar. Processes. 2020;8(10):1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8101294

38. Escobedo-García S, Salas-Tovar JA, Flores-Gallegos AC, Contreras-Esquivel JC, González-Montemayor ÁM, López MG, et al. Functionality of agave bagasse as supplement for the development of prebiotics-enriched foods. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2020;75:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-019-00785-z

39. Mohan V, Sandeep S, Deepa R, Shah B, Varghese C. Epidemiology of type 2 diabetes: Indian scenario. Indian Journal of Medical Recearch. 2007;125(3):217–230. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17496352/

40. Yargatti R, Muley A. Sensory characteristics of selective traditional Indian sweets using agave syrup and stevia: An observatory study. Functional Foods in Health and Disease. 2022;12(12):748–758. https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v12i12.1042

41. Gulati S, Misra A. Sugar intake, obesity, and diabetes in India. Nutrients. 2014;6(12):5955–5974. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/nu6125955

42. Srikanth P, Ram MR. Economic Impact of Festivals: Evidence from Diwali effect on Indian stock market. International Refereed Research Journal. 2013;2(1):27–37.

43. Jain S, Wadhwa R. Study of Changing Pattern of Preference and Purchase Decision at the Time of Festivals:(Empirical Study of Purchase Decision of Edible Gift Items). 4th National Conference on Recent Trends in Humanities, Technology, Management and Social Development. 2019;9:513–518. https://www.indusedu.org/pdfs/IJREISS/IJREISS_3006_27959.pdf

44. Maity TK, Kumar R, Misra AK. Prevalence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from Chhana based Indian sweets in relation to public health. Indian Journal of Microbiology. 2010;50:463–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088- 011-0102-9

45. Chawla D, Sondhi N. Attitude and consumption patterns of the Indian chocolate consumer: An exploratory study. Global Business Review. 2016;17(6):1412–1426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916660408

46. Dixit S, Khanna SK, Das M. All India survey for analyses of colors in sweets and savories: Exposure risk in Indian population. Journal of Food Science. 2013;78(4):T642–T647. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12068

47. da Silva AN, Silva R de C dos SN d, Ferreira MAM, Minim VPR, Costa T de MT da, Perez R. Performance of hedonic scales in sensory acceptability of strawberry yogurt. Food Quality and Preference. 2013;30(1):9–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.04.001

48. Yang Q, Ng ML. Paired comparison/directional difference test/2-alternative forced choice (2- AFC) test, simple difference test/same-different test. In: Rogers L, editor. Discrimination Testing in Sensory Science. Woodhead Publishing; 2017. pp. 109–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101009-9.00005-8

49. Struck S, Jaros D, Brennan CS, Rohm H. Sugar replacement in sweetened bakery goods. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2014;49(9):1963–1976. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12617

50. Cotton RH, Rebers PA, Maudru JE, Rorabaugh G. The role of sugar in the food industry. In: Cantor SM, editor. Use of Sugars and Other Carbohydrates in the Food Industry. American Chemical Society; 1955. pp. 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/ ba-1955-0012.ch001

51. Luo X, Arcot J, Gill T, Louie JC, Rangan A. A review of food reformulation of baked products to reduce added sugar intake. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2019;86:412–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2019.02.051

52. Erickson S, Carr J. The technological challenges of reducing the sugar content of foods. Nutrition Bulletin. 2020; 45(3):309–314 https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12454

53. Mata-Ramírez D, Serna-Saldívar SO, Villela-Castrejón J, Villaseñor-Durán MC, Buitimea-Cantúa NE. Phytochemical profiles, dietary fiber and baking performance of wheat bread formulations supplemented with Roselle (Hibiscus sabdariffa). Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization. 2018;2:2657–2665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-018-9883-4

54. Čižauskaitė U, Jakubaitytė G, Žitkevičius V, Kasparavičienė G. Natural ingredients-based gummy bear composition designed according to texture analysis and sensory evaluation in vivo. Molecules. 2019;24(7):1442. https://doi.org/10.3390/ molecules24071442

55. Belščak-Cvitanović A, Komes D, Dujmović M, Karlović S, Biškić M, Brnčić M, et al. Physical, bioactive and sensory quality parameters of reduced sugar chocolates formulated with natural sweeteners as sucrose alternatives. Food Chemistry. 2015;167:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.064

56. Ignot-Gutiérrez A, Ortiz-Basurto RI, García-Barradas O, Díaz-Ramos DI, Jiménez-Fernández M. Physicochemical and functional properties of native and modified agave fructans by acylation. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2020;245:116529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116529

57. Ozuna C, Franco-Robles E. Agave syrup: An alternative to conventional sweeteners? A review of its current technological applications and health effects. LWT. 2022;162:113434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.1134


Войти или Создать
* Забыли пароль?