Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
Cairo, Egypt
Moscow, Russian Federation
Professor A.G. Aganbegyan defines a new transport and logistics infrastructure as a key factor of economic growth, welfare, and transformation of Russia’s socio-economic system. This new infrastructure should include two-way highways, high-speed railways, regional airports, and major logistics centers in key transport hubs. Unfortunately, such projects have a very long payback cycle that may last up to 20–25 years. Moreover, the investments may be as high as 3 trillion rubles annually. As a result, transport and logistics suppliers alone cannot support such a large-scale initiative. Domestic logistics is currently going through all the stages from 1PL to 5PL, which places very high requirements on the multimodality of transport and logistics in physical infrastructure, software, and hardware. These processes encourage research cooperation between industries aimed at developing novel interoperable R&D solutions. Russian transport and logistics infrastructure depends heavily on the railway industry: its main operational task is to maintain passenger and cargo traffic, as well as to provide safety. Under the current sanctions, Russian railroads face the challenge of developing and scaling advanced scientific and technical reserves. Technological independence relies on end-to-end production technologies, e.g., artificial intelligence algorithms, digital twins, etc., which impose requirements on data interoperability. This article describes the potential that domestic railway enterprises have for improving commercialization of innovations and technology transfer. The authors used the theory of strategy and the methodology of strategizing developed by Professor V.L. Kvint to design several recommendations on how railroad companies may increase their economic motivation to overcome various barriers.
commercialization of innovations, transport and logistics industry, data economy
1. Aganbegyan AG. Foreign experience in strategizing accelerated socio-economic development and options for its application in Russia. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2024;4(1):1–26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2024-4-1-1-26
2. Bakhvalov LA. Modelirovanie system [System modeling]. Moscow: Moscow State Mining University; 2006. 294 p. (In Russ.)
3. Grigorʹeva NN. Problemy i perspektivy vnedreniya innovatsiy na zheleznodorozhnom transporte [Problems and prospects for introducing innovations in railway transport]. Transportnaya infrastruktura Sibirskogo regiona [Transport Infrastructure in Siberia]. 2018;2:40–43. (In Russ.)
4. Zhuravleva NA. Problems of introduction of digital technologies in transport. Transport Rossiyskoy Federatsii [Transport in the Russian Federation]. 2019;82(3):19–22. (In Russ.)
5. Zudin NN, Mukhlisov RR. Corporate innovation systems in the rail industry: Country specifics and position in the main industry models. Innovations. 2017;222(4):93–102. (In Russ.)
6. Ivolgina NV, Stepanova DI. Venture financing as a tool for investing in new ideas and scientific and technological achievements. Biznes v zakone. Ehkonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal [Business in Law: Journal of Economics and Law]. 2015;(6):211–214. (In Russ.)
7. Katunina IV. Innovation development of railway companies in strategic changes context. Vestnik Sibirskoy gosudarstvennoy avtomobilʹno-dorozhnoy akademii [Bulletin of Siberian State Automobile and Highway Academy]. 2012;23(1):101–106. (In Russ.)
8. Kvint VL. The concept of strategizing. Vol. I. St. Petersburg: NWIM RANEPA; 2019. 132 p. (In Russ.)
9. Kvint VL. Global emerging market: strategic management and economics. Moscow: Biznes Atlas; 2012. 627 p. (In Russ.)
10. Kvint VL, Khvorostyanaya AS, Sasaev NI. Advanced technologies in strategizing. Economics and Management. 2020;26(11):1170–1179. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-11-1170-1179
11. Kondratʹev VV. Modelʹno-orientirovannyy sistemnyy inzhiniring 2.0 [Model-Based Systems Engineering 2.0]. Moscow: MFTI; 2021. (In Russ.)
12. Kondratiev VV, Tishchenko EB. Architectural engineering of hybrid models incorporating digital twins and machine learning. Economic Strategies. 2023;25(5):94–99. (In Russ.)
13. Kondratʹev VV, Tishchenko EB. Strategiya poshagovogo rasshireniya sistemnykh instrumentov tsifrovogo inzhiniringa s iskusstvennym intellektom [Strategy for step-by-step expansion of digital engineering system tools with artificial intelligence]. Economic Strategies. 2024;192(6). (In Russ.)
14. Kregel DA. Experience of railway transport enterprises in the implementation of innovative activities. Vestnik Universiteta. 2018;(3):33–38. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2018-3-33-38
15. Lapidus BM. Raising productivity and efficiency of railway transport on innovation base. Russian Railway Science Journal. 2012;(5):3–6. (In Russ.)
16. Lapidus BM, Macheret DA. Makroehkonomicheskaya rolʹ zheleznodorozhnogo transporta: teoreticheskie osnovy, istoricheskie tendentsii i vzglyad v budushchee [Macroeconomics of railway transport: theoretical foundations, historical trends, and prospects]. Moscow: URSS; 2013. 234 p. (In Russ.)
17. Makarov VL, Bakhtizin AR, Sushko ED. The national strategic power, international trade, and national economic success in an unstable world. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2023;3(3):277–297. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2023-3-3-277-297
18. Molchanova SM. Venchurnoe finansirovanie kak osnovnoy ehlement innovatsionnogo razvitiya [Venture financing as the main element of innovative development]. Aktualʹnye problemy razvitiya ehkonomiki i upravleniya v sovremennykh usloviyakh: Materialy II Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Relevant Issues of Economic Development and Management: Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference]; 2019; Moscow. Moscow: Dashkov & K; 2019. p. 180–185. (In Russ.)
19. Semin AN, Tishchenko EB, Kislitsky MM, Kurdyumov AV. Development of methodological provisions of project management in the field of ensuring technological sovereignty of the agro-industrial complex. Fundamental and Applied Research Studies of the Economics Cooperative Sector. 2022;(4):3–10. (In Russ.)
20. Kvint VL, Novikova IV, Alimuradov MK, Sasaev NI. Strategizing the national economy during a period of burgeoning technological sovereignty. Administrative Consulting. 2022;165(9):57–67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2022-9-57-67
21. Tahirov ShM. The role of public – private partnership in the transport sector development of the Republic of Dagestan. UEHPS: upravlenie, ehkonomika, politika, sotsiologiya [MEPS: Management, Economics, Politics, and Sociology]. 2016;(3):35–41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24411/2412-2025-2016-00043
22. Tishchenko EB, Slavyantsev MV. Cross-country coordination of reindustrialization: Cooperation potential between Russia and Egypt. Strategizing: Theory and Practice. 2023;3(2):158–171. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-2435-2023-3-2-158-171
23. Shcherbakov NB. Preimushchestva primeneniya alʹyansov pri realizatsii proektov kapitalʹnogo stroitelʹstva. Rezulʹtaty adaptatsii kontraktnoy formy FAC-1 k rossiyskomu zakonodatelʹstvu [Advantages of using alliances in the implementation of capital construction projects. Adapting the FAC-1 contract form to Russian legislation]. Doklad na Ezhegodnoy otraslevoy konferentsii predstaviteley stroitelʹnogo kompleksa atomnoy otrasli [Annual Industry Conference of Representatives of the Nuclear Industry Construction Complex]. 2019. (In Russ.)
24. Abuhamoud MAA, Rahmat RAOK, Ismail A. Transportation and its concerns in Africa: A review. The Social Sciences. 2011;6(1):51–63.
25. Akinshipe O, Aigbavboa C. A theoretical review of the state of infrastructure in Africa. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management; 2020; Dubai. Dubai: IEOM Society International; 2020. p. 1647–1655.
26. Attwairi A. The patterns and trends of African urbanization. Libyan Studies Journal. 2017;2:247–255.
27. Choi J, Dutz M, Usman Z. The future of work in Africa. Harnessing the potential of digital technologies for all. The World Bank; 2020. 257 p.
28. Bolshakov N, Badenko V, Yadykin V, Tishchenko E, Rakova X, Mohireva A, et al. Cross-industry principles for digital representations of complex technical systems in the context of the MBSE approach: A review. Applied Sciences. 2023;13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/app13106225
29. Eessaar E. The database normalization theory and the theory of normalized systems: Finding a common ground. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing. 2016;4(1):5–33.
30. Irandu EM, Owilla HH. The economic implications of belt and road initiative in the development of railway transport infrastructure in Africa: The case of the standard gauge railway in Kenya. The African Review. 2020;47:457–480. https://doi.org/10.1163/1821889X-12340027
31. Liu X, Wang X, Feng X. Study and application of the IOT technology in railway. Advanced Materials Research. 2013;694–697:3329–3332. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.694-697.3329
32. Luke R, Walters J. Logistics challenges and opportunities in Africa in the 2020s. In: Merkert R, Hoberg K, editors. Global logistics and supply chain strategies for the 2020s. Cham: Springer; 2022. pp. 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95764-3_21
33. Parida P. Unlocking mineral resource potential in southern African countries: Is rail infrastructure up to the challenge? Transportation Research Procedia. 2014;1(1):206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.07.021
34. Seba Minsili L, Kisito MJ, Gilbert T, Jean N, Gadam KA, Christian DP. Requirements to the modernization of African railway networks: The standard gauge versus the metric gauge. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology. 2017;8(7):925–941.
35. Sankpal KA, Metre KV. A review on data normalization techniques. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology. 2020;9(6):1438–1441. https://doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV9IS060915
36. Shah S, Rutherford R, Menon S. Emerging technologies of IoT usage in global logistics. International Conference on Computation, Automation and Knowledge Management; 2020; Dubai. Dubai; 2020. p. 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCAKM46823.2020.9051530
37. Güneralp B, Lwasa S, Masundire H, Parnell S, Seto KC. Urbanization in Africa: Challenges and opportunities for conservation. Environmental Research Letters. 2017;13(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa94fe
38. de Vos K, Janssens C, Jacobs L, Campforts B, Boere E, Kozicka M, et al. Urbanization will drive changes in the African food system and biodiversity through dietary shifts rather than through urban expansion. Nature Portfolio. 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3365391/v1
39. Xie Y, Wang C. Evolution and construction differentiation pattern of African railway network. Sustainability. 2021;13(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413728
40. Yu L, Pan Y, Wu Y. Research on data normalization methods in multi-attribute evaluation. International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering; 2009; Wuhan. Wuhan; 2009. p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/CISE.2009.5362721
